[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fwd: Logo conclusions
From: |
Dmitri A. Sergatskov |
Subject: |
Re: Fwd: Logo conclusions |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Feb 2006 16:05:51 -0700 |
On 2/25/06, Daniel J Sebald <address@hidden> wrote:
...
> The thing about the sombrero is it suggests more to me a plotting utility.
> But Octave in concept is more math (discrete) in nature.
...
I assumed that the "sombrero" logo on the octave web page (and the one that
A.S. Hodel just sent) is the accepted logo for octave. Unfortunately while it
is a nice logo to put on a web page or title page of a book, it just has too
high level of details to be a small logo to put on say "Start" menu in a desktop
manager. So I can see two possibilities here. We can continue to pursue
math-related image or we can allude ("tongue-in-cheek") to the name of
the curve in the "main" logo ("sombrero"). The logo does not have to
tell people
what the software does, as long as the logo is well-recognizable.
After all Tux the penguin does just fine for Linux.
>
> Dan
>
Sincerely,
Dmitri.
--
- Logo conclusions, Sebastien Loisel, 2006/02/22
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Fwd: Logo conclusions, Sebastien Loisel, 2006/02/25
- Re: Fwd: Logo conclusions, Lee Olson, 2006/02/25
- Re: Fwd: Logo conclusions, Daniel J Sebald, 2006/02/25
- Re: Fwd: Logo conclusions, John Swensen, 2006/02/26
- Re: Fwd: Logo conclusions, kraiskil, 2006/02/26
- Re: Fwd: Logo conclusions, Daniel J Sebald, 2006/02/26
- Re: Fwd: Logo conclusions, Lee Olson, 2006/02/26
- Re: Fwd: Logo conclusions, Daniel J Sebald, 2006/02/26
- Re: Fwd: Logo conclusions, Bill Denney, 2006/02/25
- Re: Logo conclusions, Dr. A S Hodel, 2006/02/26