[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bi variate to mono variate functions
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: Bi variate to mono variate functions |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 15:40:18 -0500 |
On 30-Mar-2006, I wrote:
| Inline functions are created using eval_string, which is given
| something like
|
| "@(ARGS) EXPRESSION"
|
| where EXPRESSION is the argument passed to inline, and ARGS are the
| variable names extracted from EXPRESSION.
The answer appears to be yes, it would cause an incompatibility,
because functions constructed with inline don't seem to pick up
unbound variables from the parent context when they are constructed.
So we would need a way to limit this feature to actual anonymous
functions.
jwe
- Re: Bi variate to mono variate functions, (continued)
- Re: Bi variate to mono variate functions, John W. Eaton, 2006/03/30
- Re: Bi variate to mono variate functions, David Bateman, 2006/03/30
- Re: Bi variate to mono variate functions, John W. Eaton, 2006/03/30
- Re: Bi variate to mono variate functions, David Bateman, 2006/03/30
- Re: Bi variate to mono variate functions, John W. Eaton, 2006/03/30
- Re: Bi variate to mono variate functions,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: Bi variate to mono variate functions, David Bateman, 2006/03/31
- Re: Bi variate to mono variate functions, John W. Eaton, 2006/03/31
- Re: Bi variate to mono variate functions, David Bateman, 2006/03/31