[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New function proposal
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: New function proposal |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:43:41 -0500 |
On 15-Feb-2007, David Bateman wrote:
| I do however see a number of defunct child processes, but that is no
| different from the old popen2 function..
Should we be calling waitpid for the child processes to clean them up?
| I think this patch is good to go..
OK, please check it in.
Thanks,
jwe
- RE: Re: New function proposal, (continued)
- RE: Re: New function proposal, michael . goffioul, 2007/02/15
- RE: RE: Re: New function proposal, michael . goffioul, 2007/02/15
- RE: Re: New function proposal, michael . goffioul, 2007/02/15
- RE: Re: New function proposal, michael . goffioul, 2007/02/15
- Re: New function proposal, David Bateman, 2007/02/15
- Re: New function proposal,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: New function proposal, David Bateman, 2007/02/16
- Re: New function proposal, David Bateman, 2007/02/16
- Re: New function proposal, Michael Goffioul, 2007/02/16
- Re: New function proposal, David Bateman, 2007/02/16
- Re: New function proposal, John W. Eaton, 2007/02/16
- Re: New function proposal, Michael Goffioul, 2007/02/17