[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.9.11?
From: |
Michael Goffioul |
Subject: |
Re: 2.9.11? |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:53:32 +0200 |
On 4/19/07, Thomas Weber <address@hidden> wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 19. April 2007 09:47 schrieb Michael Goffioul:
> 2) "configure" script must be called with additional settings, to correctly
> define compiler; the command should looks like:
> CC=cc-msvc CXX=cc-msvc AR=ar-msvc RANLIB=ranlib-msvc ./configure
> Would it be OK to use octave_config_info('config_opts') to achieve this?
> (I mean, is it OK for other platforms?)
This is an issue we are facing in Debian as well: how to pass additional flags
to the configure script. Did you hardcode your changes into pkg.m?
For the time being, yes. But I could probably also use:
system(['cd src; ./configure ', octave_config_info('config_opts')]);
although I didn't test it yet. But the point here is that I want to use the
same flags as those used to compile octave itself. Adding *new* flags
is something different.
Michael.
Re: 2.9.11?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?, Thomas Weber, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?,
Michael Goffioul <=
- Re: 2.9.11?, Paul Kienzle, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?, John W. Eaton, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?, John W. Eaton, 2007/04/25
- Re: 2.9.11?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/04/25
Re: 2.9.11?, John W. Eaton, 2007/04/19
Re: 2.9.11?, Thomas Weber, 2007/04/19
Re: 2.9.11?, John W. Eaton, 2007/04/19
Re: 2.9.11?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/04/19
Re: 2.9.11?, A S Hodel, 2007/04/18