[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.9.11?
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: 2.9.11? |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:53:04 -0400 |
On 19-Apr-2007, Daniel J Sebald wrote:
| Which raises a point. What if the system doesn't have the "sort" command on
it
| somewhere? I've temporarily removed /sbin/sort and, yes, the syscalls.cc
test
| hangs. So, there maybe should be a timeout or test for existence in any case.
I suppose it is possible that sort would not be available, but it is a
core utility that we expect to have available for building Octave. By
time out do you mean give up and fail after N times through the loop?
I see that is what the diff in the previous patch is doing (along with
printing the number). OK, I applied that.
Thanks,
jwe
Re: 2.9.11?, A S Hodel, 2007/04/18
- Re: 2.9.11?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/18
- Re: 2.9.11?, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2007/04/18
- Re: 2.9.11?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/18
- Re: 2.9.11?, John W. Eaton, 2007/04/18
- Re: 2.9.11?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: 2.9.11?, John W. Eaton, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/19
Re: 2.9.11?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/19
Re: 2.9.11?, John W. Eaton, 2007/04/19
Re: 2.9.11?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/19
Re: 2.9.11?, John W. Eaton, 2007/04/19
Re: 2.9.11?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/19
Re: 2.9.11?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/19
sqrt(-Inf) (was Re: 2.9.11?), Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/19
Re: 2.9.11?, John W. Eaton, 2007/04/19