[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPLv3
From: |
Thomas Weber |
Subject: |
Re: GPLv3 |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Sep 2007 10:00:51 +0200 |
Am Donnerstag, den 13.09.2007, 14:35 -0400 schrieb John W. Eaton:
> Since Octave is "GNU Octave", the GNU project would like for us to
> switch to GPLv3 for future releases. Since Octave 3.0 will be coming
> soon (really, this time I mean it) we need to consider this switch
> now. Of the many dependencies we have, are there any which have
> licenses that are OK with GPLv2 but conflict with GPLv3? For example,
> any that are "GPLv2 only" (without the "at your option, any later
> version" clause)? I suppose the first thing to do is make a list of
> all the dependencies. Do we have one? If not, it would be useful to
> have anyway.
How about asking the FSF for the licenses where we are not sure? I don't
think Octave is the only software using different libraries, so
collecting the "is GPL3 (in)compatible" information in a central place
might make sense for anyone.
Thomas
- GPLv3, John W. Eaton, 2007/09/13
- Re: GPLv3, Quentin Spencer, 2007/09/13
- Re: GPLv3, John W. Eaton, 2007/09/14
- Re: GPLv3, Thomas Weber, 2007/09/14
- Re: GPLv3, John W. Eaton, 2007/09/14
- Re: GPLv3, Shai Ayal, 2007/09/14
- Re: GPLv3, John W. Eaton, 2007/09/14
- Re: GPLv3, Shai Ayal, 2007/09/14
- Re: GPLv3, Thomas Weber, 2007/09/15
- Re: GPLv3, John W. Eaton, 2007/09/17
Re: GPLv3,
Thomas Weber <=
Re: GPLv3, David Bateman, 2007/09/14