[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new snapshot soon
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: new snapshot soon |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Sep 2007 12:26:36 -0400 |
On 15-Sep-2007, Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
| --- "John W. Eaton" <address@hidden> wrote:
| > Are there any essential patches to be included or important bugs that
| > should be fixed before I make another snapshot? Please let me know
| > soon as I would like to make another snapshot tomorrow or by Monday at
| > the latest.
|
| In the 'config.h' after 'the ./configure ....',
|
| 983: #if !defined(HAVE_SIGSET_T)
| 984: //typedef int sigset_t;
| 985: #endif
|
| I always have to commented out 'typedef int sigset_t;' before 'make'.
| Otherwise the dupulicate defenition error is occured.
| If it can be automatically set by the configure script it will be grateful.
| I aplogize that my poor abilitity allowed me to make patch for the configure
script.
If sigset_t is available on your system, why is it not found?
Octave's configure.in file has the following line
AC_CHECK_TYPES([sigset_t, sig_atomic_t], , , [#include <signal.h>])
Can you please look at config.log and see why this fails? Also, where
is sigset_t declared if including signal.h does not do it?
jwe
- Re: new snapshot soon, (continued)
- Re: new snapshot soon, kahacjde, 2007/09/13
- Re: new snapshot soon, David Bateman, 2007/09/14
- Re: new snapshot soon, Jean-Francois Cardoso, 2007/09/14
- Re: new snapshot soon, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/09/14
- Re: new snapshot soon,
John W. Eaton <=