[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPLv3
From: |
Arno Onken |
Subject: |
Re: GPLv3 |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:39:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070828) |
John W. Eaton wrote:
> If it is just .m files, then you can use any license you choose, as .m
> files are not considered derivative works of Octave, so are not even
> required to have GPL-compatible licenses. However, I would certainly
> encourage people to distribute code under GPL compatible licenses, and
> I don't think that we should distribute any non-free software as a
> package for Octave.
So just to clarify, is it accepted to license new/existing individual
octave-forge code under GPLv3?
Arno
- Re: GPLv3, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/12
- Re: GPLv3, David Bateman, 2007/10/12
- Re: GPLv3, Thomas Weber, 2007/10/12
- Re: GPLv3, David Bateman, 2007/10/12
- Re: GPLv3, Thomas Weber, 2007/10/12
- Re: GPLv3, Arno Onken, 2007/10/12
- Re: GPLv3, Thomas Weber, 2007/10/12
- Re: GPLv3, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/12
- Re: GPLv3, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/12
- Re: GPLv3,
Arno Onken <=
- Re: GPLv3, David Bateman, 2007/10/14