[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: make check recommended practice?
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: make check recommended practice? |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Dec 2007 13:08:21 -0500 |
On 3-Dec-2007, David Bateman wrote:
| I'm not sure how in that case to distinguish a test like
|
| %!test assert(...)
|
| from an optional test, as the code for the test can immediate follow the
| "test" keyword..
OK.
| This is why I thought a special tag for the optional
| tests would be easy, as in that case the next keyword following the
| "test" keyword is known explicitly to be the optional block.. Maybe
| something like
|
| %!testif HAVE_CHOLMOD
| %! assert (...)
|
| mean
|
| %!test
| %! if (!isempty(findstr(octave_config_info ("DEFS"),"HAVE_CHOLMOD")))
| %! assert (...)
| %! endif
This seems fine to me.
jwe
- Re: make check recommended practice?, Muthiah Annamalai, 2007/12/03
- Re: make check recommended practice?, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/03
- Re: make check recommended practice?, David Bateman, 2007/12/03
- Re: make check recommended practice?,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: make check recommended practice?, David Bateman, 2007/12/03
- Re: make check recommended practice?, Moritz Borgmann, 2007/12/03
- Re: make check recommended practice?, David Bateman, 2007/12/03
- Re: make check recommended practice?, David Bateman, 2007/12/03
- Re: make check recommended practice?, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/03
- Re: make check recommended practice?, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/03
- Re: make check recommended practice?, David Bateman, 2007/12/03