[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 3.0 when?
From: |
Peter A. Gustafson |
Subject: |
Re: 3.0 when? |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Dec 2007 10:57:55 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.7 |
On Thursday 13 December 2007 10:50:18 Dupuis wrote:
> David Bateman-3 wrote:
> > There are going to be fixes after 3,0, and 2.9.19 is really a bug fix
> > release for 2.9.18. So why not Friday next week, after seeing there are
> > no major issues with 2.9.19, and give us a Xmas present :-)
> > D.
>
> Excellent idea. This way, Debian maintainers will have enough free time to
> prepare new packages, and the upgrade will be ready when going back to work
>
> :-)
>
> Pascal
I had one thought as I was compiling 2.9.19 yesterday... the lingering issue
of print() and sizing. I don't think we should "fix" the problem before 3.0,
however I suggest disabling the "-S" sizing option so as to not establish a
backwards compatibility issue.
Just a thought,
Pete Gustafson
- 3.0 when?, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/12
- Re: 3.0 when?, David Bateman, 2007/12/12
- Re: 3.0 when?, Dupuis, 2007/12/13
- Re: 3.0 when?,
Peter A. Gustafson <=
- Re: 3.0 when?, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/13
- print function options; imread/imwrite (was: Re: 3.0 when?), John W. Eaton, 2007/12/13
- Re: imread/imwrite, Søren Hauberg, 2007/12/14
- Re: imread/imwrite, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/14
- Re: imread/imwrite, Søren Hauberg, 2007/12/14
- Re: 3.0 when?, Rafael Laboissiere, 2007/12/14
- Re: 3.0 when?, Dupuis, 2007/12/17
Re: 3.0 when?, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/13
Re: 3.0 when?, Kai Habel, 2007/12/13