[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Graphics code small questions?
From: |
Michael Goffioul |
Subject: |
Re: Graphics code small questions? |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:46:09 +0100 |
On 1/14/08, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> | virtual void remove_child (const graphics_handle& h)
> | {
> | if (valid_object ())
> | get_properties ().remove_child (h);
> | else
> | error ("base_graphics_object::remove_child: invalid graphics object");
> | }
> |
> | What do you think about it?
>
> I think that change is fine. I think the reason it was done this way
> originally is that at first we did not have a get_properties method,
> and I needed some way to make the dispatch work. I remember being
> slightly annoyed that I was duplicating these functions, but at the
> time I didn't see another way to do it.
OK, I'll prepare a patch when a get some time. In the meantime, if
anybody is willing to do it, please go ahead (but just tell me, so I don't
waste my time).
Michael.