[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: difference between path / pathdef
From: |
Ben Abbott |
Subject: |
Re: difference between path / pathdef |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:05:12 -0500 |
On Jan 15, 2008, at 6:38 PM, John W. Eaton wrote:
On 15-Jan-2008, Ben Abbott wrote:
| Shall I run the command above prior to creating the patch?
It doesn't matter since we don't care about generated files. We only
need patches for the Makefile.in files that you have to modify, not
the generated Makefiles.
jwe
ok here's the patch, ChangeLog, and new-files. The new files are
placed in a sub-directories corresponding to where they belong in the
scripts directory.
Ben
existing-files.patch
Description: Binary data
ChangeLog
Description: Binary data
new-file.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
- Re: difference between path / pathdef,
Ben Abbott <=
- Re: difference between path / pathdef, John W. Eaton, 2008/01/15
- Re: difference between path / pathdef, Ben Abbott, 2008/01/15
- Re: difference between path / pathdef, John W. Eaton, 2008/01/15
- Re: difference between path / pathdef, Ben Abbott, 2008/01/16
- Re: difference between path / pathdef, John W. Eaton, 2008/01/17
- Re: difference between path / pathdef, Ben Abbott, 2008/01/17
Re: difference between path / pathdef, John W. Eaton, 2008/01/17