[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Q: Low hanging fruit?
From: |
Søren Hauberg |
Subject: |
Re: Q: Low hanging fruit? |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:31:53 +0100 |
man, 10 03 2008 kl. 23:11 -0400, skrev John Swensen:
> The image processing toolbox function 'edge' does not have a *true*
> canny edge detector. There is a non-standard option called 'andy'
> that is similar to the canny edge detector, but isn't quite it. That
> is the only edge method still missing from the octave version of
> edge.m. I implemented a canny edge detector for my computer vision
> class, but haven't had time nor motivation to incorporate it into
> edge.m, but am more than willing to contribute my code. I also have a
> friend in the class who wrote a much more optimized/vectorized (yet
> more memory hungry) version that he said he may be willing to
> contribute in place of mine.
I have a fairly good implementation of 'edge' that I never got around to
contributing to the 'image' package at
http://hauberg.org/share/files/edge.m
I'll submit the 'canny' stuff later today.
Søren
- More New Functions: findfigs.m, isfloat.m, genvarname.m, Bill Denney, 2008/03/10
- Q: Low hanging fruit?, Ben Abbott, 2008/03/10
- Re: Q: Low hanging fruit?, David Bateman, 2008/03/11
- Re: Q: Low hanging fruit?, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/03/11
- Re: Q: Low hanging fruit?, David Bateman, 2008/03/11
- Re: Q: Low hanging fruit?, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/03/11
- Re: Q: Low hanging fruit?, David Bateman, 2008/03/11
- Re: Q: Low hanging fruit?, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/03/11
- Re: Q: Low hanging fruit?, John W. Eaton, 2008/03/11
- Re: Q: Low hanging fruit?, David Bateman, 2008/03/11