[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Changeset] Re: Faster Array transpose
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
[Changeset] Re: Faster Array transpose |
Date: |
Tue, 06 May 2008 13:49:58 -0400 |
On 5-May-2008, David Bateman wrote:
| I got previous without the patch
|
| N = 128, time = 0.0016666 sec
| N = 129, time = 0.0003333 sec
| N = 1024, time = 0.0439971 sec
| N = 1025, time = 0.0336645 sec
| N = 2048, time = 0.276649 sec
| N = 2049, time = 0.172656 sec
| N = 4096, time = 1.19492 sec
| N = 4097, time = 0.700954 sec
|
| and with it
|
| N = 128, time = 0 sec
| N = 129, time = 0 sec
| N = 1024, time = 0.0319979 sec
| N = 1025, time = 0.0243318 sec
| N = 2048, time = 0.170655 sec
| N = 2049, time = 0.117326 sec
| N = 4096, time = 0.745285 sec
| N = 4097, time = 0.558964 sec
|
| and similar improvements for the hermitian operator.
That's a lot of work for a fairly modest improvement...
Is there a ChangeLog entry for this? With that, I'd apply the change
(but skipping the diffs for the float matrix files I don't have yet).
Also, how about some tests for this since the algorithm is now more
complex?
Thanks,
jwe
- [Changeset] Re: Faster Array transpose, David Bateman, 2008/05/04
- [Changeset] Re: Faster Array transpose,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: [Changeset] Re: Faster Array transpose, dbateman, 2008/05/06
- Re: [Changeset] Re: Faster Array transpose, David Bateman, 2008/05/06
- Re: [Changeset] Re: Faster Array transpose, John W. Eaton, 2008/05/20
- Re: [Changeset] Re: Faster Array transpose, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/05/21
- Re: [Changeset] Re: Faster Array transpose, John W. Eaton, 2008/05/21
- Re: [Changeset] Re: Faster Array transpose, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/05/21
- Re: [Changeset] Re: Faster Array transpose, dbateman, 2008/05/21
- Re: [Changeset] Re: Faster Array transpose, John W. Eaton, 2008/05/21
- Re: [Changeset] Re: Faster Array transpose, David Bateman, 2008/05/21
- Re: [Changeset] Re: Faster Array transpose, John W. Eaton, 2008/05/21