[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: improved matrix_type check
From: |
dbateman |
Subject: |
Re: improved matrix_type check |
Date: |
Thu, 22 May 2008 13:42:25 -0700 (PDT) |
Jaroslav Hajek-2 wrote:
>
> But you can say the same for dense matrices. I don't see why
> stretching your memory to its limits should be more common with sparse
> matrices.
>
Ok given it depends on the person and their problem. But if that's the case
single precision sparse matrices are as useful as full ones.
> Another concern may be speed - especially if it's memory traffic that
> slows the computations down.
>
True, but the same is true for full matrices as well. Ok I give up single
precision full matrices are as useful as single precision sparse matrices
:-)
Cheers
David
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/improved-matrix_type-check-tp17371327p17413058.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.