Re: classdef support for octave

[David Bateman]

Michael Goffioul wrote:
> (OK, not many reactions so far. I guess it's low priority...)
>
> To answer myself, I think that the implementation should be
> more tightly coupled to the symbol table code of octave. I'll
> try to redesign the code that way (but it'll take some time as
> it requires jumping into the intrinsics of symtab.[h|cc]). At first
> sight, my first idea is to add a cls_info object to store class
> specific informations, managing dispatching and inheritance
> as well as class reloading.
>
> I'll see what comes out of this. Any help is of course welcome.
>
>   
No comments not because of lack of interest but because my minds on 
other things.. I think it would be great to have classdef support for 
3.2 if its relatively easy to implement as you imply.

D.


--
David Bateman                                address@hidden
Motorola Labs - Paris                        +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph) 
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin    +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob) 
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE                  +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax) 

The information contained in this communication has been classified as: 

[x] General Business Information 
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only 
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary