Re: tree walker evaluator

[John W. Eaton]

On  7-Jan-2009, David Bateman wrote:

| I notice this patch also comments out the MAYBE_DO_BREAKPOINT macros. 
| Does that mean that breakpoints won't be correctly accepted? 
| Unfortunately "make check" won't spot that type of regression with this 
| change.

Yes, as it is currently written, that macro won't work outside the
tree_*::eval member functions.  I'll see if I can make a debugging
evaluator work before I check in the changes.  Thinking about this
now, should it be possible to do debugging and profiling at the same
time?

jwe