[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: support for advanced gnuplot features (was: Plotting semi-trasnparen
From: |
Ben Abbott |
Subject: |
Re: support for advanced gnuplot features (was: Plotting semi-trasnparent patches?) |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:49:25 -0500 |
On Thursday, January 29, 2009, at 10:09AM, "John W. Eaton" <address@hidden>
wrote:
>On 29-Jan-2009, Ben Abbott wrote:
>
>|
>| On Jan 28, 2009, at 9:57 PM, John W. Eaton wrote:
>|
>| > Even without a version of gnuplot that supports the X11 window
>| > position feature, I see a difference with this patch, and I wasn't
>| > expecting that. Given the following sequence
>| >
>| > xlabel ("foo");
>| > ## move window with mouse
>| > ylabel ("bar");
>| >
>| > Without the patch, the window stays put after moving it with the
>| > mouse.
>| >
>| > With the patch, and a version of gnuplot that does not support the
>| > position feature, the window moves back to its original position after
>| > the ylabel call.
>|
>| I think you got that backwards (or my changeset is improperly
>| implemented).
>|
>| With or without my changeset , and without the gnuplot patch
>| supporting the position feature, the window should stay put.
>
>It doesn't, at least for me. When I apply the patch and use gnuplot
>4.2.2, and execute the sequence above, the window moves back to the
>original position after the call to ylabel. If I remove the patch,
>the window stays put.
Ok, I found the problem. Try the attached version.
btw, while looking at this I noticed an unexpected behavior
octave:8> true && NaN
ans = 1
For Matlab
>> true && NaN
??? NaN's cannot be converted to logicals.
Shall I file a bug report?
Ben
changeset-x11_position.patch
Description: Binary data
- Re: support for advanced gnuplot features (was: Plotting semi-trasnparent patches?), (continued)
- Re: support for advanced gnuplot features (was: Plotting semi-trasnparent patches?), John W. Eaton, 2009/01/27
- Re: support for advanced gnuplot features (was: Plotting semi-trasnparent patches?), Ben Abbott, 2009/01/28
- Re: support for advanced gnuplot features (was: Plotting semi-trasnparent patches?), John W. Eaton, 2009/01/28
- Re: support for advanced gnuplot features (was: Plotting semi-trasnparent patches?), Ben Abbott, 2009/01/28
- Re: support for advanced gnuplot features (was: Plotting semi-trasnparent patches?), Ben Abbott, 2009/01/28
- Re: support for advanced gnuplot features (was: Plotting semi-trasnparent patches?), John W. Eaton, 2009/01/28
- Re: support for advanced gnuplot features (was: Plotting semi-trasnparent patches?), Ben Abbott, 2009/01/28
- Re: support for advanced gnuplot features (was: Plotting semi-trasnparent patches?), John W. Eaton, 2009/01/28
- Re: support for advanced gnuplot features (was: Plotting semi-trasnparent patches?), Ben Abbott, 2009/01/29
- Re: support for advanced gnuplot features (was: Plotting semi-trasnparent patches?), John W. Eaton, 2009/01/29
- Re: support for advanced gnuplot features (was: Plotting semi-trasnparent patches?),
Ben Abbott <=
- Re: support for advanced gnuplot features (was: Plotting semi-trasnparent patches?), John W. Eaton, 2009/01/29
- NaN in boolean expressions (was: Re: support for advanced gnuplot... ), John W. Eaton, 2009/01/29
- Re: support for advanced gnuplot features (was: Plotting semi-trasnparent patches?), Ben Abbott, 2009/01/29
- Re: support for advanced gnuplot features (was: Plotting semi-trasnparent patches?), Ben Abbott, 2009/01/29
- Re: support for advanced gnuplot features (was: Plotting semi-trasnparent patches?), John W. Eaton, 2009/01/30
- Re: support for advanced gnuplot features (was: Plotting semi-trasnparent patches?), Ben Abbott, 2009/01/30
- Re: support for advanced gnuplot features (was: Plotting semi-trasnparent patches?), Ben Abbott, 2009/01/29