[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patching the stable branch (was: Re: Octave 3.1.52 available for ftp
From: |
Thomas Weber |
Subject: |
Re: patching the stable branch (was: Re: Octave 3.1.52 available for ftp) |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Feb 2009 20:24:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 03:30:33PM -0500, John W. Eaton wrote:
> On 12-Feb-2009, Søren Hauberg wrote:
>
> | tor, 12 02 2009 kl. 11:53 -0500, skrev John W. Eaton:
> | > Comments?
> |
> | I agree! "stable" should be stable, which means as little as possible
> | should change.
>
> I would also like to add that there is nothing that says we even have
> to provide a series of stable bug fixing releases.
What alternative do you have in mind? Releasing 3.0 and then nothing
until 3.2?
Thomas
- Re: patching the stable branch (was: Re: Octave 3.1.52 available for ftp), (continued)
- Re: patching the stable branch (was: Re: Octave 3.1.52 available for ftp), Søren Hauberg, 2009/02/12
- Re: patching the stable branch (was: Re: Octave 3.1.52 available for ftp), John W. Eaton, 2009/02/12
- Re: patching the stable branch (was: Re: Octave 3.1.52 available for ftp), Rafael Laboissiere, 2009/02/13
- Re: patching the stable branch (was: Re: Octave 3.1.52 available for ftp), Søren Hauberg, 2009/02/13
- Re: patching the stable branch (was: Re: Octave 3.1.52 available for ftp), Rafael Laboissiere, 2009/02/13
- bug tracking (was: Re: patching the stable branch (was: ...)), John W. Eaton, 2009/02/13
- Re: patching the stable branch (was: Re: Octave 3.1.52 available for ftp), Thomas Weber, 2009/02/14
- Re: patching the stable branch (was: Re: Octave 3.1.52 available for ftp),
Thomas Weber <=
- Re: patching the stable branch (was: Re: Octave 3.1.52 available for ftp), John W. Eaton, 2009/02/14