[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux
From: |
Marco Atzeri |
Subject: |
Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:27:40 +0000 (GMT) |
--- Dom 22/2/09, Rafael Laboissiere ha scritto:
> Da: Rafael Laboissiere
> Oggetto: Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux
> A: address@hidden
> Data: Domenica 22 febbraio 2009, 21:19
> * Rafael Laboissiere [2009-02-22
> 20:28]:
>
> > * John W. Eaton [2009-02-22
> 13:34]:
> >
> > > On 22-Feb-2009, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> > >
> > > | * Jaroslav Hajek
> [2009-02-22 18:55]:
> > > |
> > > | > I don't say it's impossible, but I
> do not see how it can actually be
> > > | > possible, unless int64_t is a typedef of
> double (which would really be
> > > | > weird).
> > > |
> > > | Not even that causes a compilation error on my
> amd64 Debian system.
> > >
> > > How is int64_t defined on the systems where the
> failure happens?
> >
> > Tell me how I can discover that, please, and I will do
> it on the failing
> > architectures.
>
> It is actually simple: I just ran cpp on a file containing
> "#include
> <stdint.h>". Here are the results:
>
> On amd64 ("good" architecture):
>
> typedef long int int64_t;
> typedef unsigned long int uint64_t;
>
> On mipsel ("bad" architecture):
>
> typedef long long int int64_t;
> typedef unsigned long long int uint64_t;
>
> --
> Rafael
on cygwin
typedef long long int64_t
typedef unsigned long long uint64_t
Regards
Marco
Passa a Yahoo! Mail.
La webmail che ti offre GRATIS spazio illimitato,
antispam e messenger integrato.
http://it.mail.yahoo.com/
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, (continued)
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Marco Atzeri, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Rafael Laboissiere, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, John W. Eaton, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Rafael Laboissiere, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Rafael Laboissiere, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Rafael Laboissiere, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Marco Atzeri, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux,
Marco Atzeri <=
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Rafael Laboissiere, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Marco Atzeri, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Marco Atzeri, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Marco Atzeri, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, John W. Eaton, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Rafael Laboissiere, 2009/02/22