[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new snapshot patches
From: |
Thomas Weber |
Subject: |
Re: new snapshot patches |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:01:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 08:01:30AM -0700, Rik wrote:
>
> >
> > Subject:
> > new snapshot
> > From:
> > "John W. Eaton" <address@hidden>
> > Date:
> > Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:25:33 -0400
> > To:
> > octave maintainers mailing list <address@hidden>
> >
> > To:
> > octave maintainers mailing list <address@hidden>
> >
> >
> > As I mentioned recently, I would like to make a new snapshot this
> > week. Are there any patches or bug reports that should be addressed
> > before I do that? I know about the one Ben posted earlier today. I
> > would also like to try to fix the problem with the SKIP parameter when
> > writing to existing files (we should skip and not write NUL in that
> > case). Is there anything else?
> >
> 3/25/09
>
> John,
>
> I've put a bunch of changesets for the documentation up on the Savannah
> tracker. There are 49 .texi files to review and I'm about 1/3 of the
> way through. It takes about an hour per .texi file because when I need
> to make a change I have to hunt through the code to discover whether the
> texinfo came from a .m file, a .cc file, or somewhere else. I'm
> thinking of going ahead and doing all the .m files at once.
I might be missing the obvious, but how about doing the change in one go
and using
hg record
afterwards?
Thomas