[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 3.2.0
From: |
Tatsuro MATSUOKA |
Subject: |
Re: 3.2.0 |
Date: |
Wed, 20 May 2009 19:08:58 +0900 (JST) |
Hello
--- Michael Goffioul wrote:
> 2009/5/20 Tatsuro MATSUOKA <address@hidden>:
> > Just from my curiosity, I would like ask you that you will come back to
> > octave for
> windows/MSVC binary
> > release at octave 3.2 ?
>
> At the moment, this is not in my plan to make further releases for
> Windows/MSVC. FSF has clearly stated that the way runtime libs
> are bundled in the installer is a GPL violation. Moreover, John
> has expressed his preference for Windows/MinGW, so I don't see
> the point of continuing producing Windows/MSVC binaries.
>
> > AFAIK, you have started to work on MinGW, have not you?
>
> Not really. I just tried to compile octave with MinGW, but didn't
> complete the whole stuff.
Thank you for your reply.
I am now trying to build the recent octave-forge packages on octave-3.0.5 by
GCC-4.4.0-TDM-dw2 and
planning to make reports on oct-dev lists.
Cheers!
Tatsuro
--------------------------------------
Power up the Internet with Yahoo! Toolbar.
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/toolbar/
- Re: 3.2.0, (continued)
- Re: 3.2.0, Michael Goffioul, 2009/05/20
- Re: 3.2.0, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/05/20
- Re: 3.2.0, Michael Goffioul, 2009/05/20
- Re: 3.2.0, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/05/21
- Re: 3.2.0, Michael Goffioul, 2009/05/21
- Re: 3.2.0, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/05/21
- Re: 3.2.0, Michael Goffioul, 2009/05/21
- Re: 3.2.0, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2009/05/20
- Re: 3.2.0, Michael Goffioul, 2009/05/20
- Re: 3.2.0, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2009/05/20
- Re: 3.2.0,
Tatsuro MATSUOKA <=
- Re: 3.2.0, John W. Eaton, 2009/05/20
Re: 3.2.0, Michael Goffioul, 2009/05/19
Re: 3.2.0, Carlo de Falco, 2009/05/19