[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: autoconf-2.64 required?
From: |
Jaroslav Hajek |
Subject: |
Re: autoconf-2.64 required? |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Aug 2009 09:18:20 +0200 |
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Daniel J Sebald<address@hidden> wrote:
> Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
>
>> How would you estimate the date? I quoted that those are macros from
>> Autoconf 2.64; which seems sufficient to decide whether it is OK to
>> delete. A FIXME markup should probably be there, though.
>
> That would be fine. It wouldn't take someone too long to figure out why the
> code was added, but something like
>
> FIXME: Remove when autoconf 2.64+ is commonplace, 14aug2009
>
> above the comments would make it immediately clear the code can (and should)
> go.
>
> Dan
>
I ended up with this:
http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/b03062e16c6f
--
RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek
computing expert & GNU Octave developer
Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
Prague, Czech Republic
url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz