[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug tracking
From: |
Ben Abbott |
Subject: |
Re: bug tracking |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Mar 2010 06:27:32 +0900 |
On Mar 4, 2010, at 1:47 AM, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
> In any case, I think that in order for the transition to be successful
> we need to be strict and only fix bugs actually reported in the
> tracker. When a bug report arrives at the mailing list, we shall point
> out the reporter to the tracker. Anyone is free to transfer the bug
> from ML to the tracker, but we need a handshake that it must be done
> prior to fixing the bug.
>
> If we all agree to this policy, all what is left is to vote for the
> tracker. My vote goes for Savannah.
>
> regards
I was happy with Savannah as well.
Regarding the transition, I suggest that address@hidden be shut down and the
web page be updated to direct bug reports to savannah.
What about bug_report.m>? Is there a way that it may be modified to file a bug
report to savannah directly?
Ben
- Re: bug tracking, (continued)
- Re: bug tracking, Thomas Weber, 2010/03/04
- Re: bug tracking, John W. Eaton, 2010/03/24
- Re: bug tracking, Thorsten Meyer, 2010/03/24
- Re: bug tracking, John W. Eaton, 2010/03/24
- Re: bug tracking, Thorsten Meyer, 2010/03/24
- Re: bug tracking, Thomas Weber, 2010/03/24
- Re: bug tracking, Jarno Rajahalme, 2010/03/24
- Re: bug tracking, John W. Eaton, 2010/03/24
- Re: bug tracking, Jarno Rajahalme, 2010/03/25
- Re: bug tracking, Rob Mahurin, 2010/03/26
- Re: bug tracking,
Ben Abbott <=
- Re: bug tracking, John W. Eaton, 2010/03/03
Re: Bug Tracking, Rik, 2010/03/30