Re: dim_vector constructor problem

[Søren Hauberg]

ons, 28 04 2010 kl. 01:53 -0400, skrev John W. Eaton:
> Given that we also now have
> 
>   dim_vector (i, j, k, ...)
> 
> constructors for up to 7 dimensions, does anyone object to removing
> the
> 
>   dim_vector (const octave_idx_type *vec, size_t vec_size)
> 
> constructor that was added by this changeset?  To me, it seems the
> simplest solution to the problem.  Do we lose anything by not having
> this constructor now?

I think we actually discussed this previously (I can't find the thread,
though) and agreed that it was okay to remove this constructor. I was
the one who suggested the constructor in the first place, and since we
have the constructors up to 7 dimensions, then it seems fine to me to
remove it.

Soren