Re: IPC Functions

octave-maintainers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IPC Functions

From:	Judd Storrs
Subject:	Re: IPC Functions
Date:	Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:51:06 -0400

2010/8/23 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <address@hidden>

Same as everything else, really. Are you going to be the one to
maintain them? Are they currently in a good enough state to be in core
Octave? Are there any licensing issues we need to take into
consideration?

If octave doesn't want them in the core, they shouldn't be listed in the PROJECTS file so that well-meaning people looking for some way to contribute aren't immediately set upon by this snotty, bellicose attitude.

--judd

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

IPC Functions, William Demchick, 2010/08/16
- Re: IPC Functions, David Bateman, 2010/08/23
  - Re: IPC Functions, Jake, 2010/08/23
    - Re: IPC Functions, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2010/08/23
    - Re: IPC Functions, Judd Storrs <=
    - Re: IPC Functions, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2010/08/23
    - Re: IPC Functions, forkandwait, 2010/08/23
    - Re: IPC Functions, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/08/23
    - Re: IPC Functions, William Demchick, 2010/08/23
  - Re: IPC Functions, Judd Storrs, 2010/08/23
  - Re: IPC Functions, Olaf Till, 2010/08/23
    - Re: IPC Functions, William Demchick, 2010/08/23

Prev by Date: Re: IPC Functions
Next by Date: Re: IPC Functions
Previous by thread: Re: IPC Functions
Next by thread: Re: IPC Functions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread