[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: surface cdata property restricted to double or uint8
From: |
Michael Goffioul |
Subject: |
Re: surface cdata property restricted to double or uint8 |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:41:27 +0100 |
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Jaroslav Hajek <address@hidden> wrote:
> I considered John's latest changeset to be the current situation. I
> thought that previously uint8 data wasn't allowed at all. At least
> that's the impression I got.
Just for the record. It was supported, as double data was supported as
well. Other data types weren't supported.
Michael.
- Re: surface cdata property restricted to double or uint8, (continued)
- Re: surface cdata property restricted to double or uint8, Michael Goffioul, 2010/08/30
- Re: surface cdata property restricted to double or uint8, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/08/30
- Re: surface cdata property restricted to double or uint8, Michael Goffioul, 2010/08/30
- Re: surface cdata property restricted to double or uint8, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/08/30
- Re: surface cdata property restricted to double or uint8, Michael Goffioul, 2010/08/30
- Re: surface cdata property restricted to double or uint8, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/08/30
- Re: surface cdata property restricted to double or uint8,
Michael Goffioul <=
- Re: surface cdata property restricted to double or uint8, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/08/30
- Re: surface cdata property restricted to double or uint8, John W. Eaton, 2010/08/30