|
From: | Michael D Godfrey |
Subject: | Re: wait_for_file ?? [print via pipes - help testing on Windows?] |
Date: | Sat, 18 Sep 2010 22:27:23 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100907 Fedora/3.1.3-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.3 |
On 09/18/2010 10:02 PM, Ben Abbott wrote:
octave:1> close all octave:2> backend fltk octave:3> __print_parse_opts__("-depsc", "fltk-epsc.eps") ans = { append_to_file = 0 canvas_size = 576 432 debug = 0 debug_file = octave-print-commands.log devopt = epsc epstool_binary = /usr/bin/epstool figure = [](0x0) fig2dev_binary = /usr/bin/fig2dev fontsize = font = force_solid = 0 formatted_for_printing = 0 ghostscript = { binary = /usr/bin/gs debug = 0 device = epscrop = 1 level = [](0x0) output = papersize = pageoffset = 0 0 resolution = 150 antialiasing = 0 } loose = 0 name = fltk-epsc.eps orientation = portrait pstoedit_binary = /usr/bin/pstoedit printer = send_to_printer = 0 special_flag = textnormal tight_flag = 0 use_color = 1 lpr_options = -l unlink = {}(0x0) } octave:4> Ben, Should I have found "preview" in the above? The evidence that I can figure out suggests that there is still a synchronization problem with the gl2ps functions. Shai has said that he can find no way to ensure that gl has generated the file that you need. It may be that this needs to wait until Shai is back. But, if you have things that I can try in the meantime, I will be happy to help. In the meantime I will build a system on my local machine, so I can see what difference it makes to run locally as opposed to through ssh or NX. Michael |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |