Re: Better name for ROADMAP?

[Rik]

John W. Eaton wrote:
> On 10-Jan-2011, Rik wrote:
> 
> | I just updated the file ROADMAP in the toplevel directory which is a guide
> | to the directory structure of the source code.  Is there a better name than
> | ROADMAP which makes me think that this is a list of goals for future 
> releases?
> 
> How about merging it with the HACKING file?

And what about README.devel?  Should all 3 files be merged into a guide on
working with the raw source code?  Or are the development releases such as
3.3.54 different enough (no requirement for gnulib, Mercurial) that they
get their own file.

--Rik