octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: branching for release?


From: Michael D Godfrey
Subject: Re: branching for release?
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:13:40 -0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.7

On 01/19/2011 02:44 PM, John W. Eaton wrote:
On 19-Jan-2011, Judd Storrs wrote:

| On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 3:58 PM, logari81 <address@hidden> wrote:
| 
|     Concerning the replacement of "backend" I don't have any fixed opinion.
|     Concerning replacing "fltk" I would vote against "fltk_opengl", I would
|     prefer one of "fltk" or "opengl".
| 
| 
| I imagine external graphical interfaces would use also use their own names.
| So, I propose:
| 
| backend -> "graphics"
| fltk -> "internal"

We might eventually use gtk or qt in addition to fltk.  Which one
would be "internal"?

jwe
would fltk -> opengl

be better?  I agree that "internal" seems not quite right either.

Michael


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]