[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: looking ahead to 3.6
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: looking ahead to 3.6 |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Feb 2011 08:25:26 -0600 |
On 14 February 2011 08:17, John Swensen <address@hidden> wrote:
> So what is the consensus? Should I give up on GTK+ for OctaveDE and
> switch to QT?
[snip]
> I'm not sure about the ease of making an editor, but I'm assuming
> that is a wash. There can probably also be a lot of
> cross-pollination with QtOctave also.
QtOctave's editor can probably be easily adapted. Only problem I see
is that a few editor functions about running and debugging the script
are tied to QtOctave's pipes, but the UI and syntax highlighting parts
are probabyl covered.
- Jordi G. H.
- Re: looking ahead to 3.6, (continued)
- Re: looking ahead to 3.6, Ben Abbott, 2011/02/12
- Re: looking ahead to 3.6, Kai Habel, 2011/02/13
- Re: looking ahead to 3.6, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2011/02/13
- Re: looking ahead to 3.6, CdeMills, 2011/02/13
- Re: looking ahead to 3.6, John Swensen, 2011/02/13
- Re: looking ahead to 3.6, Richard Campbell, 2011/02/13
- Re: looking ahead to 3.6, Michael Goffioul, 2011/02/14
- Re: looking ahead to 3.6, John Swensen, 2011/02/14
- Re: looking ahead to 3.6, Michael Goffioul, 2011/02/14
- Re: looking ahead to 3.6, John Swensen, 2011/02/14
- Re: looking ahead to 3.6,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <=
- Re: looking ahead to 3.6, Søren Hauberg, 2011/02/14
- Re: looking ahead to 3.6, John Swensen, 2011/02/14
- Re: looking ahead to 3.6, John Swensen, 2011/02/14
- Re: looking ahead to 3.6, Michael Goffioul, 2011/02/15
- Re: looking ahead to 3.6, John Swensen, 2011/02/15
- Re: looking ahead to 3.6, some_guy, 2011/02/15
- Re: looking ahead to 3.6, John Swensen, 2011/02/15
- Re: looking ahead to 3.6, Przemek Klosowski, 2011/02/14
- Re: looking ahead to 3.6, Przemek Klosowski, 2011/02/14
- Re: looking ahead to 3.6, Ryan Rusaw, 2011/02/14