[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug #32319
From: |
Ben Abbott |
Subject: |
Re: Bug #32319 |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:48:50 -0500 |
On Feb 14, 2011, at 3:14 PM, Michael D Godfrey wrote:
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: Bug #32319
> Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 22:27:27 +0100
> From: logari81 <address@hidden>
> To: Michael D Godfrey <address@hidden>
> CC: octave maintainers mailing list <address@hidden>
>
> On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 13:11 -0800, Michael D Godfrey wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Do you want to push the changeset for this bug (your bug32319-1b.diff
> > plus the Changelog entry)?
> >
> > Does it make sense to close this report and open a new one about
> > plots not being refreshed, which I mentioned in my last comment on
> > 32319? Or, do you already know why that is happening?
> >
> > Michael
> >
>
> hmm, I think we'd better wait for jwe's opinion about the patch. Maybe
> he prefers to fix this bug making correct use of waitpid.
>
> In any case I don't have any explanation about the refresh problem yet,
> but it would probably be easy to fix if I would have a way to reproduce
> it.
>
> Kostas
>
> The patch referred to works correctly for me. It fixes
> the fdopen error problem in fltk backend. I noticed
> that it has been "waiting" long enough so that its lines
> numbers not longer match the current source.
>
> Is it OK for Kostas to push an updated version?
>
> Michael
I have no objection.
Ben