[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mac OS X build reference?
From: |
fork |
Subject: |
Re: Mac OS X build reference? |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:25:19 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Richard Campbell <rlcamp.pdx <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Apple installs nothing into /usr/local/ on a vanilla machine, so anything
there is yours - it functions the
> same as /opt.
>
> Other things, such as sed, flex, and pcre, are already present in /usr,
supplied by Apple, but not
> compatible with the Octave build process. If you install your versions in
/usr/local then the Apple
> versions will still take precedence and build will still fail. I recommend
overwriting them with
> --prefix=/usr, but if you wanted to preserve the Apple versions you could
install them to /usr/local (the
> default) or elsewhere, and manage the search order yourself.
I will try to preserve the Apple tools as such and put everything into /opt/ or
/usr/local. I will let you know how it goes....
> Furthermore, if you want to remove something, sometimes 'sudo make uninstall'
works, otherwise you can
> try 'sudo make install' and then delete all the files with the new timestamp.
The former sounds ok, the latter pretty hack-ish.
Re: Mac OS X build reference?, Richard Campbell, 2011/02/16
Re: Mac OS X build reference?, John W. Eaton, 2011/02/16
Re: Mac OS X build reference?, fork, 2011/02/18
- Re: Mac OS X build reference?, Richard Campbell, 2011/02/18
- Re: Mac OS X build reference?, fork, 2011/02/18
- Re: Mac OS X build reference?, Richard Campbell, 2011/02/18
- Re: Mac OS X build reference?, fork, 2011/02/18
- Re: Mac OS X build reference?, Richard Campbell, 2011/02/18
- Re: Mac OS X build reference?, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2011/02/18
- Re: Mac OS X build reference?, fork, 2011/02/18
- Re: Mac OS X build reference?, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2011/02/18