Re: Question about short circuit operators

[CdeMills]

Michael D. Godfrey wrote:
> 
> 
> Isn't the point of the short circuit test to deal with side-effects of  
> possibly
> untested conditionals?  If there are no side-effects, why issue the
> warning?  Octave does the right thing, but the warnings do seem
> excessive.
> 

No, no. If you explicitly want short circuit test, use the appropriate form

if some_cond && some_other_cond 
   do_something
endif

(x > 0) || warning('Log(x) will return complex result')

and so on.

Regards

Pascal
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-short-circuit-operators-tp3323547p3324097.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.