[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: stable and default branches
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: stable and default branches |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Apr 2011 09:09:39 -0400 |
On 7-Apr-2011, Rik wrote:
| I went ahead and introduced a stable branch to the repo and checked in a
| documentation change on it (changeset: 6a4e042b6114).
|
| As a quick guide for others, use 'hg update <default | stable>' to switch
| between branches. I'm finding it easier to maintain one directory tree for
| each branch rather than switching back and forth in the same tree and
| causing unnecessary rebuilds. My setup is a directory called "octave-doc"
| which is set to the "stable" branch and directory "octave-dev" set to the
| "default" branch. Once the branch has been set 'hg pull ; hg update' will
| do its normal job of getting changes and updating you to the tip of your
| current branch.
Thanks.
I noticed that after pulling, I was on the stable branch and had to
explicitly say "hg update -C default" to get back on default. But as
you say, after doing that, my local copy should stay on default after
further updates. I'm not sure why it switched in this case.
I also closed the release-3-4-x branch.
jwe
- Re: Bug tracker and transplants, (continued)
- Re: Release 3.4.1, Rik, 2011/04/04
- Re: Release 3.4.1, Orion Poplawski, 2011/04/04
- Re: Release 3.4.1, John W. Eaton, 2011/04/06
- Re: Release 3.4.1, Rik, 2011/04/06
- Re: Release 3.4.1, John W. Eaton, 2011/04/07
- Re: stable and default branches, Rik, 2011/04/07
- Re: stable and default branches,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: Release 3.4.1, Orion Poplawski, 2011/04/06
- Re: Release 3.4.1, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2011/04/07