[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: QtOctave probably EOL
From: |
Richard Crozier |
Subject: |
Re: QtOctave probably EOL |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Jul 2011 08:58:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.1 |
On 13/07/2011 02:05, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso wrote:
> I meant to mention this a while ago: QtOctave has been orphaned by its
> original creator, Pedro Lucas. I mentioned to him how Quint could be
> its successor, integrated into the Octave sources, and he welcomed the
> idea. There a number of collaborators of Pedro Lucas who seem
> interested in working on it and are in the process of learning Qt to
> do so. This is happening in the Spanish language QtOctave mailing
> list. Now that a GUI is a release goal of 3.6 (or should we push that
> to 4.0?), would it be ok to invite them to participate in this
> discussion in the main maintainers mailing list?
>
> - Jordi G. H.
>
I did some work on QtOctave, and as far as I could tell, was the last
person to do so, at least I was the last person to check anything into
the repository. Noone else checked anything in the whole time I worked
on it.
Learning Qt is easy from my experience.
Would working on Quint require building octave and dependencies from
scratch? Contributing to QtOctave was easy as it was just a small
program that was easy to build on any platform using cmake. I developed
in windows for instance.
Richard (crobar in the QtOctave repo)
--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
- QtOctave probably EOL, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2011/07/12
- Re: QtOctave probably EOL,
Richard Crozier <=