[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unbundling ARPACK (for reals this time)
From: |
Tatsuro MATSUOKA |
Subject: |
Re: Unbundling ARPACK (for reals this time) |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Dec 2011 08:41:41 +0900 (JST) |
Hello
I do not have any objection unbundling the ARPACK.
The ARPACK can be easily built on MinGW platform.
Regards
Tatsuro
--- On Thu, 2011/12/1, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> On 16 November 2011 04:32, bastien ROUCARIES
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Le Tuesday 8 November 2011 23:47:56, Thomas Weber a écrit :
> >> On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 12:21:16PM +0100, roucaries bastien wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Thomas Weber <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> > BTW do you need help on arpack ?
> >>
> >> Opps, thanks for pointing me at this. I had totally forgotten about
> >> arpack being bundled.
> >
> > Do you need help ? Do you need a new upstream ?
>
> I forgot to mention this. It's been a crazy month for me, forgive me.
>
> During the 2011 GSoC mentor summit, I briefly worked with Sylvester to
> merge the Scilab and Octave versions of ARPACK. The result is here:
>
> http://forge.scilab.org/index.php/p/arpack-ng/
>
> We need to make more noise about this, but ARPACK is now officially
> forked! Collaboratively maintained too.
>
> Octave people: can we unbundle ARPACK now? Perhaps even in time for
> the 3.6 release?
>
> - Jordi G. H.
>