[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Octave 3.5.90 snapshot available for ftp
From: |
onur güngör |
Subject: |
Re: Octave 3.5.90 snapshot available for ftp |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:07:45 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111124 Thunderbird/8.0 |
On 12/15/2011 04:45 PM, John W. Eaton wrote:
> [Oops, I really thought I had sent this message, but there it was,
> hiding out as a draft in an Emacs buffer. No wonder there were no
> replies... --jwe]
>
>
> A new snapshot of Octave is now available from alpha.gnu.org in the
> directory /gnu/octave:
>
> 54442245b840483f40b9c0f9026b1256 octave-3.5.90.tar.gz
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 3003 3002 18107269 Dec 12 04:17 octave-3.5.90.tar.gz
>
> The snapshot is tagged in the usual way (ss-3-5-90) in the Mercurial
> archive.
>
> Please remember that these snapshots are provided for testing
> purposes. I do not consider them to be Octave releases. If people
> think there will be confusion because of the version number, then we
> can add a notice to the Octave startup message.
>
> I plan to release Octave 3.6.0 in the next few weeks. Even if you
> have been building Octave regularly from the Mercurial archive, it
> would help if you could build from the snapshot and report any
> problems.
Before all, I must say that I am very new here. Actually, I was
following the conversations only for a week or so. Having said that, I
should also add that I am a strong advocate of Octave in my department
and among my colleagues. I use Octave during my research in statistics
so I am also thinking about taking responsibilities in any suitable
stage of the development process.
Too much information for just a little feedback. :)
Anyways,
I get the following error during the tests. Even if you said that it
would be better to build from the snapshot, I already had the source
from Mercurial and thought that they are pretty much the same. Maybe the
last changeset id may tell something:
changeset: 14086:41511cce0488
branch: stable
tag: tip
user: Rik <address@hidden>
date: Wed Dec 21 10:12:40 2011 -0800
summary: test: Fix 2nd demo for slice() (bug #35143)
I didn't make any changes.
I ran autogen.sh, configure, fixed missing libraries and make. It
compiles successfully. But when I make "make check", I get one FAIL in
...
src/ov-oncleanup.cc .................................... PASS
0/1 FAIL 1
...
scripts/general/profile.m
..............................profiler.cc:400: void
profile_data_accumulator::add_current_time(): Assertion `last_time >=
0.0 && last_time <= t' failed.
panic: Aborted -- stopping myself...
make[1]: *** [check] Aborted
Do you have any ideas? Is this a problem for my possible bug fixes or such?
Thanks
Onur
> jwe