[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: isnan in fortran
From: |
c. |
Subject: |
Re: isnan in fortran |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:55:23 +0200 |
On 11 Apr 2012, at 14:09, John W. Eaton wrote:
> OK, that's a problem. With the intrinsic ISNAN, the compiler chooses
> the right version based on the type of the argument. But with Fortran
> 77 and our own function there is no overloading, so we would need to
> use different names.
>
> jwe
In that case I would rather go back to the sed or cpp option
as (X.NE.X) works with both single and double precision.
c.
- Re: isnan in fortran, (continued)
- Re: isnan in fortran, c., 2012/04/11
- Re: isnan in fortran, John W. Eaton, 2012/04/11
- Re: isnan in fortran, John W. Eaton, 2012/04/11
- Re: isnan in fortran, Michael Goffioul, 2012/04/11
- Re: isnan in fortran, c., 2012/04/11
- Re: isnan in fortran, Michael Goffioul, 2012/04/11
- Re: isnan in fortran, c., 2012/04/11
- Re: isnan in fortran, c., 2012/04/11
- Re: isnan in fortran, Mike Miller, 2012/04/11
- Re: isnan in fortran, John W. Eaton, 2012/04/11
- Re: isnan in fortran,
c. <=
- Re: isnan in fortran, c., 2012/04/11
- Re: isnan in fortran, Mike Miller, 2012/04/11
- Re: isnan in fortran, c., 2012/04/11
- Re: isnan in fortran, John W. Eaton, 2012/04/11
- Re: isnan in fortran, c., 2012/04/11
- Re: isnan in fortran, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2012/04/11
- Re: isnan in fortran, c., 2012/04/11
- Re: isnan in fortran, Mike Miller, 2012/04/11
- Re: isnan in fortran, Mike Miller, 2012/04/11
- Re: isnan in fortran, John W. Eaton, 2012/04/11