[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: .h.in vs .in.h
|
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
|
Subject: |
Re: .h.in vs .in.h |
|
Date: |
Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:59:53 -0400 |
On 11 April 2012 09:50, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 11-Apr-2012, Michael Goffioul wrote:
>
> | I think it's simply that you can't do:
> |
> | grep ... *.h
> |
> | This won't include *.h.in files.
>
> Right, it's easy to miss something.
>
> Anyway, it seems like a safe change to me. But I seem to be missing
> details lately so I thought I would ask whether it would bother
> anyone if I made this change.
Eh, seems like you've already wrapped this in a try-catch block.
Better to ask for forgiveness than to ask for permission.
- Jordi G. H.
- .h.in vs .in.h, John W. Eaton, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Júlio Hoffimann, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Michael Goffioul, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, John W. Eaton, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <=
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Daniel J Sebald, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Júlio Hoffimann, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, John W. Eaton, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Júlio Hoffimann, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Daniel J Sebald, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, John W. Eaton, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Daniel J Sebald, 2012/04/11