Re: LLVM not picked up - too old version?

[Philip Nienhuis]

Max Brister wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Philip Nienhuis
> <address@hidden>  wrote:
> > What version of LLVM is needed these days?
> >
> > I have llvm 3.0; configure output at the end doesn't mention the llvm
> > libs/flags/include but only says something like:
> > "JIT compiler for loops: false"
> >
> > AFAICR a week or two weeks ago it did pick up the llvm stuff (that is, I saw
> > the llvm libs/include/flags mentioned in configure's output).
> >
> > linux Mageia 2, gcc 4.6.3, Pentium M
> >
> > Philip
>
> LLVM 3.0 should still work, I haven't tested it recently though.
> Recently there was a change that requires "--enable-jit" in order for
> JIT to be enabled.

Thanks, yes --enable-jit=yes did the trick.
I must have missed that announcement somehow.

BTW I now see messages (using sources updated two hours ago):
"cc1plus: warning: /usr/bin/llvm-config: not a directory {enabled by 
default]"
repeated twice after every compile step. Should I start worrying?

Philip