Re: [OctDev] complex error function

[Steven G. Johnson]

On 11/21/12 12:50 PM, Thomas Weber wrote:
> Get the code included into one of the existing code bases (maybe [1])
> or implement erfc for libc. Less work for everybody.

(You mention boost, but like the C99 standard, the current C++ standard 
only specifies erf and erfc for real arguments, nor does it include a 
scaled error function.)

The objection to this in general is: if you won't include support for a 
complex error function until it is incorporated into the C or C++ 
standard library, you may be waiting a long .... long .... long .... time.