[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Handling "parfor" as "for"
|
From: |
litro |
|
Subject: |
Re: Handling "parfor" as "for" |
|
Date: |
Thu, 6 Dec 2012 02:22:26 -0800 (PST) |
Hi,
I am on octave 3.2.4 and parfor is not working here. Was it removed again? I
don't require actual parallelism just as the original thread title states
handling *parfor* as *for*.
--
View this message in context:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Re-Handling-parfor-as-for-tp3841541p4647595.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for",
litro <=