[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: control toolbox - time delays
From: |
Carnë Draug |
Subject: |
Re: control toolbox - time delays |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:28:30 +0000 |
On 10 January 2013 18:17, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 10 January 2013 12:56, Carnë Draug <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> You probably want to branch "octave-forge/extra/control-devel" instead
>> of "octave-forge/main/control". Also, you don't need `svn mkdir`, the
>> `svn copy` command should create the directory for you.
>
> Ew, svn branching. Are we doing a lot of that?
No. Control package is the only one doing this at the moment. But this
last couple of weeks I'd have welcome it to the image package.
> At the risk of sounding fanatical, would there be any value if we start
> moving OF to hg?
At the moment, I think the time cost would not make up for the value
of using hg.
Carnë
- control toolbox - time delays, thomas-v, 2013/01/09
- Re: control toolbox - time delays, thomas-v, 2013/01/10
- Re: control toolbox - time delays, Carnë Draug, 2013/01/10
- Re: control toolbox - time delays, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2013/01/10
- Re: control toolbox - time delays,
Carnë Draug <=
- Re: control toolbox - time delays, Lukas Reichlin, 2013/01/10
- Re: control toolbox - time delays, Carnë Draug, 2013/01/10
- Re: control toolbox - time delays, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2013/01/10
- Re: control toolbox - time delays, Lukas Reichlin, 2013/01/10
- Re: control toolbox - time delays, Philip Nienhuis, 2013/01/10
- Re: control toolbox - time delays, Carnë Draug, 2013/01/11
- Re: control toolbox - time delays, Philip Nienhuis, 2013/01/14
- Re: control toolbox - time delays, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2013/01/15
- Re: control toolbox - time delays, Lukas Reichlin, 2013/01/15
- Re: control toolbox - time delays, Philip Nienhuis, 2013/01/15