[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new postgresql package
From: |
Olaf Till |
Subject: |
Re: new postgresql package |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Jan 2013 10:15:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 07:19:43PM -0500, Michael Goffioul wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Olaf Till <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > can I maintain my postgresql package at forge? Package README
> > attached.
> >
>
> Did you consider the existing (orphaned) database package? Maybe you could
> merge with it (removing whatever doesn't work) and take ownership of the
> package?
I had roughly scanned the database package and decided to start from
scratch. Merging with 'database' would now mean to replace its
postgresql part. But from what I understand in 'database', the user
interface of my package is designed differently (e.g. parameters
passable from Octave to postgresql, specification of type of these
parameters with postgresql typenames, user-function for updating known
types, format of returned Octave values same as format of passed
Octave values) so I think it would not fit. Also, I'm ignorant on
interface libraries to mysql and sqlite and of ODBC libraries since I
only use postgresql; and I'm ignorant on SWIG.
I don't think I could merge and take over.
Do you know the database package well? From what I read in the list I
thought it does not work now. Is that not true?
Olaf
--
public key id EAFE0591, e.g. on x-hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: new postgresql package, Carnë Draug, 2013/01/13