[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: control toolbox - time delays
From: |
Lukas Reichlin |
Subject: |
Re: control toolbox - time delays |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Jan 2013 17:30:38 +0100 |
On 11.01.2013, at 10:30, address@hidden wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> As far as I am concerned, I have no problem using the svn or move to another
> VCS. I am not an experienced in using svn and so I will need some time to
> learn using it either way.
>
> If Lukas decides to move, it is OK, if he stays, I will do as advised by
> Carnë (thanks by the way).
>
> best regards
>
> thomas
I would say that Jordi should go ahead with the move from SVN to HG. Even if
the web interface stays the same, we can profit from HGs advantages like easier
branching.
Thomas, I had a closer look at the draft code you sent me. I don't know how
your code evolved since then, but I ran into a problem when running example
script "optiPID" (or test_control): In @lti/plus.m you assume in lines 36-39
and 50-53 that sys1 and sys2 are LTI objects. But one of them could be a
double, i.e. when using
s = tf ('s')
G = 4 / (s + 1)
It is __sys_group__ on line 55 which converts sys1 and sys2 to the appropriate
LTI model type.
Best regards,
Lukas
- Re: control toolbox - time delays, (continued)
- Re: control toolbox - time delays, Lukas Reichlin, 2013/01/10
- Re: control toolbox - time delays, Philip Nienhuis, 2013/01/10
- Re: control toolbox - time delays, Carnë Draug, 2013/01/11
- Re: control toolbox - time delays, Philip Nienhuis, 2013/01/14
- Re: control toolbox - time delays, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2013/01/15
- Re: control toolbox - time delays, Lukas Reichlin, 2013/01/15
- Re: control toolbox - time delays, Philip Nienhuis, 2013/01/15
- Re: control toolbox - time delays, Carnë Draug, 2013/01/15
Re: control toolbox - time delays, thomas-v, 2013/01/11
Re: control toolbox - time delays, thomas-v, 2013/01/11
- Re: control toolbox - time delays,
Lukas Reichlin <=
Re: control toolbox - time delays, thomas-v, 2013/01/13