[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: yet another Java oddity
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: yet another Java oddity |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Feb 2013 16:58:59 -0500 |
On 8 February 2013 16:54, Mike Miller <address@hidden> wrote:
> tl;dr - Yes, Java does in fact modify the FPU control word which ends
> up reducing the floating point precision that Octave normally
> calculates with.
Wow...
And... wow that you found this. Thanks.
- Jordi G. H.
- yet another Java oddity, Mike Miller, 2013/02/06
- Re: yet another Java oddity, Julien Bect, 2013/02/07
- Re: yet another Java oddity, CdeMills, 2013/02/07
- Re: yet another Java oddity, Mike Miller, 2013/02/07
- Re: yet another Java oddity, John W. Eaton, 2013/02/07
- Re: yet another Java oddity, Mike Miller, 2013/02/07
- Re: yet another Java oddity, Michael Goffioul, 2013/02/07
- Re: yet another Java oddity, John W. Eaton, 2013/02/07
- Re: yet another Java oddity, Daniel J Sebald, 2013/02/07
- Re: yet another Java oddity, Mike Miller, 2013/02/08
- Re: yet another Java oddity,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <=
- Re: yet another Java oddity, Daniel J Sebald, 2013/02/08
- Re: yet another Java oddity, Daniel J Sebald, 2013/02/08
- Re: yet another Java oddity, Michael D. Godfrey, 2013/02/08
- Re: yet another Java oddity, Daniel J Sebald, 2013/02/08
- Re: yet another Java oddity, Mike Miller, 2013/02/08
- Re: yet another Java oddity, Michael D. Godfrey, 2013/02/08
- Re: yet another Java oddity, Mike Miller, 2013/02/10
- Re: yet another Java oddity, Mike Miller, 2013/02/08
- Re: yet another Java oddity, Mike Miller, 2013/02/20
- Re: yet another Java oddity, CdeMills, 2013/02/07