octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Octave in Google Summer of Code 2013 / Low Level I/O


From: Juan Pablo Carbajal
Subject: Re: Octave in Google Summer of Code 2013 / Low Level I/O
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:15:44 +0100

On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Juan Pablo Carbajal
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Carnë Draug <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On 28 February 2013 12:18, Juan Pablo Carbajal <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Stefan Mahr <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote:
>>>>> @Stefan: Please merge your code into the package and add yourself as a
>>>>> maintainer. Let me know when you have committed your changes so we can
>>>>> prepare a new release.
>>>>>
>>>>> We are on the move!
>>>>
>>>> Hi JPi, hi Andrius,
>>>>
>>>> merging is done. Compiling on linux and cygwin works. I did not test *bsd.
>>>>
>>>> With mingw (mxe-octave) only tcp works, all other interfaces fail to
>>>> compile. Should be acceptable for now.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Stefan
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I noticed that the package needs to be boostraped before it can be
>>> distributed. This breaks the current version of releasePKG.
>>> @Carnë: What would be the procedure with packages like this?
>>
>> The procedure to release package like this is that the package manager
>> runs ./bootstrap first, and then create a tarball of the result. Also,
>> remove the "autom4te.cache" directory that may have been generated.
>> Whether to also remove the bootstrap and configure.ac/in files from
>> the tarball, is up to the package manager (probably we should settle
>> on something?).
>>
>> Carnë
>
> ok, I am modifying releasePKG to run bootstrap and remove the
> "autom4te.cache" directory. The other files may help to debug user
> problems

I am getting
warning: marking 'gpib' as not implemented
warning: marking 'gpib_read' as not implemented
warning: marking 'gpib_write' as not implemented
warning: marking 'gpib_timeout' as not implemented
warning: marking 'gpib_close' as not implemented

Is gpib properly documented?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]