[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Wavelet Denoising toolbox.
From: |
Juan Pablo Carbajal |
Subject: |
Re: Wavelet Denoising toolbox. |
Date: |
Wed, 29 May 2013 15:17:43 +0200 |
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Peter L. Soendergaard
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Perhaps we can somehow coordinate so we avoid a duplication of efforts
That sounds good, I hope you can do that.
btw, it would be better if you provided a proper Octave package of
your toolbox. What are the chances of doing that?
- Wavelet Denoising toolbox., Salman Javaid, 2013/05/28
- Re: Wavelet Denoising toolbox., Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2013/05/28
- Re: Wavelet Denoising toolbox., Salman Javaid, 2013/05/28
- Re: Wavelet Denoising toolbox., Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2013/05/28
- Re: Wavelet Denoising toolbox., Peter L. Soendergaard, 2013/05/29
- Re: Wavelet Denoising toolbox.,
Juan Pablo Carbajal <=
- Re: Wavelet Denoising toolbox., Peter L. Soendergaard, 2013/05/29
- Re: Wavelet Denoising toolbox., Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2013/05/29
- Re: Wavelet Denoising toolbox., Zdeněk Průša, 2013/05/29
- Re: Wavelet Denoising toolbox., Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2013/05/29
- Re: Wavelet Denoising toolbox., Peter L. Søndergaard, 2013/05/29
- Re: Wavelet Denoising toolbox., Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2013/05/29
- Message not available
- Re: Wavelet Denoising toolbox., Carnë Draug, 2013/05/30
- Message not available
- Re: Wavelet Denoising toolbox., Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2013/05/30
- Re: Wavelet Denoising toolbox., Carnë Draug, 2013/05/30
- Re: Wavelet Denoising toolbox., Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2013/05/30