|
From: | John W. Eaton |
Subject: | Re: GSOC 2013 - FEM LIBRARY |
Date: | Fri, 31 May 2013 14:06:41 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130116 Icedove/10.0.12 |
On 05/31/2013 01:43 PM, Júlio Hoffimann wrote:
I don't think we need multiple namespaces for Octave. Am I wrong? If we use just one, what should it be? Octave? octave? octave_org or perhaps org_octave (for the Java fans among us)? jwe John, Why not a shorter 3-char name like "oct"? oct::array<T> oct::operators::add<T,U> (read altogether as "octoperators", cool huh?!)
Because Octave is named after a person, and "oct" is not his nickname. Do you use Jul as a short version of your name? jwe
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |